Key result
Force development during clot retraction is primarily dependent on platelet function, whereas clot elastic modulus depends on both fibrin structure and platelet function.
Why the study?
Does altered fibrin structure and concentration affect clot elastic modulus and platelet-mediated force development in vitro?
Does altered fibrin structure and concentration affect clot elastic modulus and platelet-mediated force development in vitro?
Clot elastic modulus is dependent on both fibrin structure and platelet function, whereas force development during clot retraction is primarily dependent on platelet function.
Differential dependence on platelets vs fibrin may refine viscoelastic testing; leaves open in vivo relevance from this animal model.
During clot retraction, platelets interact with fibrin resulting in marked reduction of clot volume. Altered fibrin structure has been reported to affect clot retraction as measured by serum expression. This study was performed to test whether such altered retraction was the result of increased resistance to network collapse or due to decreased force development by platelets. Altered fibrin structure was documented as variation of fibre mass/length ratios (mu) and shifts in clot elastic modulus. The force developed by platelets during clotting was measured directly. Increasing the fibrinogen concentration led to thinner fibre formation (decreased mu), and a linear increase in gel elastic modulus. Over a fibrinogen concentration range of 100 to 400 mg/dl, force development was minimally affected. Force development and clot elastic modulus increased in a linear fashion with increasing platelet concentration. Increasing the calcium concentration from 5 to 20 mM caused a 160% increase in fibrin fibre size (mu), and a 52% decline in clot modulus. Force developed at 1200 s declined by 17%. At 15 mg/ml, dextran and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) also increased mu, and decreased clot modulus; however, both agents markedly reduced force development. Increasing ionic strength or the addition of IgG decreased mu and increased gel elastic modulus. Force development increased modestly with increased ionic strength, did not change with addition of IgG in saline and declined with addition of IgG in maltose. This study indicates that force development is primarily dependent on platelet function while clot modulus depends on both fibrin structure and platelet function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr et al. (1995) studied Clot retraction and fibrin structure. Altered fibrin structure (via varying concentrations of fibrinogen, calcium, dextran, HES, ionic strength, or IgG) was evaluated on Force development and clot elastic modulus. Force development during clot retraction is primarily dependent on platelet function, whereas clot elastic modulus depends on both fibrin structure and platelet function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: