Both the rotational barrier for the N-(2′-methylphenyl) group in benzylamino-N-(2′-methylphenyl)succinimides 1a–h (X = NEt2, OMe, Me, H, F, Cl, CO2Me and NO2) and the spatial disposition of the N-(2′-methylphenyl) group in N-(4′-substituted 2′ -methylphenyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-dicarboximides 2a–h (X = NEt2, OMe, Me, H, F, Cl, CO2Me and NO2) are controlled by the substituents present and the solvents used. The rotational barrier of 1 decreases with an increase in σp (Hammett’s para substituent constant of X) and increases in proportion to an increase of the solvent parameter [ET(30)]. Clear correlation was observed in the plots of the syn/anti ratio of 2 against σm (Hammett’s meta-substituent constant of X) and the ratios are also controllable by the solvent polarity (µ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishikawa et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: