Key result
Diabetes mellitus did not significantly impact procedural success rates (81.2% vs 85.2% in nondiabetics; P=0.403) after chronic total occlusion recanalization with third-generation DESs.
Why the study?
Little is known about differences in CTO-PCI outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the era of third-generation drug-eluting stents.
Does diabetes mellitus impact procedural success and complication rates in patients undergoing CTO recanalization with third-generation DESs?
Cohort (n=440)
Does diabetes mellitus impact procedural success and complication rates in patients undergoing CTO recanalization with third-generation DESs?
CTO recanalization using third-generation DESs is equally feasible and safe in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic patients, with similar in-hospital success and complication rates.
Supports comparable CTO recanalization success with third-generation DESs regardless of diabetes; leaves open effects on long-term outcomes.
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic coronary occlusions (CTOs) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. There is little knowledge in the literature about differences in CTO-PCI between diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the era of third-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). In this study, we analyzed the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on procedural characteristics, complications, and acute outcomes in a cohort of 440 patients. Methods: Between 2012 and 2016, we recruited 440 consecutive patients, 116 of them with DM. All the patients underwent PCI for at least 1 CTO. Antegrade and retrograde CTO recanalization techniques were applied. Only third-generation DESs were used. We used t-tests and the Pearson chi-quadrat test to test the significant differences in the variables between the 2 groups. Results: The patients with DM were older than the nondiabetics (64.5 y vs. 61.1 y; P=0.003), and they suffered more frequently from a chronic kidney disease (7.1% vs. 2.4%; P=0.001). The nondiabetics less frequently had arterial hypertension (75.3% vs. 89.7%; P=0.001); however, they more often had a family liability for CAD (32.1% vs. 22.4%; P=0.050) and had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (59.2% vs. 56.7%; P=0.011). The success rate was 85.2% in the patients without DM and 81.2% in the patients with DM (P=0.403). The existence of DM had no impact on the procedural success and complication rates. Conclusion: Our study on 440 patients shows that diabetics and nondiabetics have similar success and complication rates after the recanalization of CTOs using third-generation DESs. It is a feasible and safe procedure and can be recommended as an alternative treatment. J Teh Univ Heart Ctr 2019;14(2):47-52 This paper should be cited as: Guelker J. E, Bansemir L, Ott R, Rock T, Guelker R, Shin D. I, Klues H. G, Bufe A. In-hospital Outcome of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus after CTO Recanalization with Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. J Teh Univ Heart Ctr 2019;14(2):47-52.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guelker et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Total chronic coronary occlusions (CTOs) (n=440). Diabetes mellitus vs. Patients without diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Procedural success rate (p=0.403). Diabetes mellitus did not significantly impact procedural success rates (81.2% vs 85.2% in nondiabetics; P=0.403) after chronic total occlusion recanalization with third-generation DESs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: