Why the study?
Does coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) reduce cardiovascular events compared to medical therapy alone in patients with T2DM and CAD?
Does coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) reduce cardiovascular events compared to medical therapy alone in patients with T2DM and CAD?
CABG, but not PCI, reduces the risk of future non-fatal MI and cardiovascular events compared to medical therapy alone in patients with T2DM and severe CAD.
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation 2 Diabetes trial showed that patients with T2DM and mild or moderate CAD can be managed equally safely with intensive medical therapy alone until revascularisation becomes clinically indicated because of advancing coronary symptoms or a clinical scenario such as unstable angina, for which revascularisation is necessary. In patients with T2DM and severe CAD, BARI 2D showed that CABG with medical therapy was superior to initial medical therapy alone in reducing cardiovascular events. This is a major new finding as this is the first trial demonstrating the potential of CABG to reduce the risk of future non-fatal MI - something PCI could not provide when compared to initial medical therapy alone. Subgroup analysis of clinical trials, registry data and recently reported trials suggest that CABG is superior to PCI in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease, but the results of the FREEDOM trial might influence future decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rutter et al. (2010) conducted a review in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. Initial medical therapy alone was evaluated on Cardiovascular events and non-fatal MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: