Key result
Inodilatory DBP reduction was substantially overestimated when based on Korotkoff-V rather than Korotkoff-IV criteria across various interventions (bias ranging from -13 to 1 mm Hg).
Why the study?
Does the use of Korotkoff V versus Korotkoff IV criteria affect the estimation of diastolic blood pressure reduction during inodilatory interventions in healthy subjects?
Does the use of Korotkoff V versus Korotkoff IV criteria affect the estimation of diastolic blood pressure reduction during inodilatory interventions in healthy subjects?
Auscultatory measurement of diastolic blood pressure using Korotkoff V criteria overestimates the reduction in DBP during inodilatory interventions compared to Korotkoff IV criteria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May overestimate inodilatory DBP reductions with Korotkoff V; leaves open optimal auscultatory criterion for research and practice.
Non-invasive measurements of blood pressure (BP) are method-specific estimates of actual blood pressure. The agreement of the auscultatory Korokoff V ('disappearance' of sound, kv) and Korokoff IV ('sound muffling' kiv) cut-off points in measuring diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated in healthy subjects in the presence of various controlled inodilatory interventions. 2. Eating (n = 8), 10 min i.v. infusion of 1 microgram min-1 isoprenaline and adrenaline (n = 12), p.o. administration of 40 mg of the PDE-III inhibitors isomazole and meribendan (n = 18) and p.o. administration of 1200 mg celiprolol (n = 15) caused evident chrono-inodilatory responses: average HR increases of 7, 19, 10, 17, 17 and 8 beats min-1, estimated CO increases of 1.6, 4.5, 2.3, 1.9, 2.6 and 1.8 1 min-1 and average shortening of QS2c of 18, 41, 8, 37, 42 and 9 ms for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively. 3. In general, there was good agreement between DBPkV and DBPkIV measurements before the administration of the inodilatory treatments (bias DBPkV-DBPkIV: 1-2 mm Hg) but the extent of inodilatory DBP reduction (-8, -6, -10, -2, -7 and -8 mm Hg according to DBPkIV for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively) was substantially overestimated when based on Korotkoff-V rather than -IV (bias DBPkV-DBPkIV in estimating the inodilatory effect on DBP: -8, -12, 1, -13, -12 and -7 mm Hg for food, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan and celiprolol, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. De (1995) studied Healthy subjects. Controlled inodilatory interventions (eating, isoprenaline, adrenaline, isomazole, meribendan, celiprolol) vs. Baseline (before administration) was evaluated on Agreement of auscultatory Korotkoff V and IV cut-off points in measuring diastolic blood pressure. Inodilatory DBP reduction was substantially overestimated when based on Korotkoff-V rather than Korotkoff-IV criteria across various interventions (bias ranging from -13 to 1 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: