Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methodological evaluation reveals seasonal biases in gridded reference evapotranspiration across regional weather stations, highlighting the necessity of local compatibility screening.
Incomplete station meteorological records constrain sustainable water-demand planning and climate-adaptation decisions in data-limited regions. Open-data reference evapotranspiration (ETo) products can provide continuous hydroclimatic information for atmospheric-demand screening, but they do not directly represent realized water demand and their use as station substitutes may introduce bias because gridded and station-derived ETo represent related but non-identical calculation and spatial domains. This study develops a station-anchored open-data ETo screening workflow for assessing local product compatibility under incomplete meteorological records. The workflow combines four official Turkish State Meteorological Service (MGM) stations in the eastern Marmara region, station-derived Hargreaves–Samani (HS) ETo for 1990–2020, TerraClimate v1.1 reference ETo, calendar-month and anomaly diagnostics, blocked historical gap-transfer tests in which omitted periods are excluded from correction fitting and tuning, and measured-radiation FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (PM) sensitivity subsets. TerraClimate reproduced the first-order annual ETo cycle strongly (r = 0.972–0.978), but mean TerraClimate-minus-HS bias remained station-dependent (+1.78 to +11.55 mm month−1) and strongly calendar-month-dependent. After removing each series’ calendar-month climatology, Pearson correlation decreased to 0.559–0.849, indicating that the common annual cycle explains a substantial part of the raw agreement. Train-only monthly-bias and nested L2 residual corrections reduced pooled blocked out-of-sample MAE, although no correction method was universally superior across stations. Measured-radiation PM subsets at Kocaeli and Yalova showed PM-minus-HS mean offsets of −4.42% and +3.37%, respectively. The blocked tests evaluate transfer to omitted historical periods rather than prospective forecasting. The results support local, season-aware compatibility screening before gridded ETo is used for climate-resilient water-resource planning; they should not be interpreted as validation of actual ET, crop water use, irrigation withdrawals, or realized water demand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Temiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: