Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The MP2/6‐31G** calculations reveal a different pattern of H‐bonding in F2NH· · ·Y (Y = FH, OH2, NH2) complexes. Whereas the blue‐shifted H‐bonding was found for F2NH· · ·FH complex (the first known case of NH· · ·Y improper blue‐shifting H‐bonding), standard H‐bonding exists for F2NH· · ·OH2and F2NH· · ·NH3complexes. A different character of H‐bonding is explained by natural bond orbital analysis showing a systematic increase of electron density in the σ* antibonding orbital of the NH bond as well as in the lone‐electron pairs of fluorine atoms of proton the acceptor. Whereas the former effect leads to elongation of the NH bond and a red shift of NH stretch frequency, the latter effect gives the opposite, that is, contraction of the NH bond and a blue shift of NH stretch frequency. Existence of a red‐ or blue‐shifted H‐bonding is explained by the dominance of the former or latter effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavel Hobza (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: