Key result
A combined radiological scoring system demonstrated high accuracy (86.1%) and correlation (kappa = 0.71) with histological response for assessing the effects of chemotherapy in primary bone sarcoma.
Why the study?
Does a combined radiological scoring system improve the accuracy of evaluating chemotherapeutic response in patients with primary bone sarcoma compared to individual imaging modalities?
Observational (n=79)
Does a combined radiological scoring system improve the accuracy of evaluating chemotherapeutic response in patients with primary bone sarcoma compared to individual imaging modalities?
Effect estimate: K = 0.71
A combined radiological scoring system provides high accuracy and correlation with histological response for assessing preoperative chemotherapy effects in primary bone sarcoma.
Supports combined scoring for noninvasive response assessment in bone sarcoma; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of bone sarcoma, evaluation of chemotherapeutic effects is extremely important. In this study, we compared radiological evaluations and histological response, and developed a combined radiological scoring system for assessing the response to chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 79 patients with primary bone sarcomas were examined by X-ray photography (Xp), angiography, MRI, 201Tl scintigraphy (Tl) and 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy (MIBI) to evaluate their response to preoperative chemotherapy. Patients were classified as responders and non-responders according to radiological images. All resected tumors were evaluated histologically and classified as a good response (≥90% necrosis) or a poor response (≤90% necrosis). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa values in radiological evaluation were calculated. Furthermore, we developed a combined radiological scoring system that correlated the results of radiological images with histological response. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90.9%, 38.2%, and 67.5% (K = 0.31), respectively, for Xp; 91.7%, 33.3%, and 66.7% (K = 0.27) for angiography; 81.0%, 67.6%, and 75.0% (K = 0.49) for MRI; 78.9%, 72.4%, and 76.1% (K = 0.51) for Tl; 85.3%, 69.2%, and 78.3% (K = 0.55) for MIBI; and 93.3%, 76.5%, and 86.1% (K = 0.71) for combined radiological scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Combined radiological evaluations showed high correlation with histological response for assessing the effects of chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miwa et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Primary bone sarcoma (n=79). Combined radiological scoring system vs. Individual radiological methods (X-ray, angiography, MRI, 201Tl scintigraphy, 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy) was evaluated on Accuracy and correlation with histological response (≥90% necrosis vs ≤90% necrosis) (K = 0.71). A combined radiological scoring system demonstrated high accuracy (86.1%) and correlation (kappa = 0.71) with histological response for assessing the effects of chemotherapy in primary bone sarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: