Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A rapid, cost-effective data entry and computerized matching system was developed for selection of HLA compatible cytapheresis donors for platelet-alloimmunized patients. The system was user-orientated with a computer-generated prompting system that facilitated program operation. Expansion of the number of compatible donors was achieved by treating splits and crossreactive HLA antigens as identical. By this mechanism, a 500-member donor pool easily supported the needs of a large patient population for single-donor cytapheresis platelets. An average of 3.4 compatible donors per patient was identified. For only two of the 48 (4%) thrombocytopenic recipients was transfusion support from the available donors inadequate to provide a posttransfusion platelet increment. At the end of 7 months, donation frequency for the 441 donors then in the pool averaged 2.0 +/- 2.4. This figure increased to 2.8 +/- 2.4 donations for the 176 panel members who actually underwent cytapheresis. Thus, the impact on donors participating in this program was not excessive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorgensen et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: