Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neo-CT) for osteosarcomas is the standard of care. Management of maxillo-facial osteosarcomas (MFOS) is challenging. In this rare disease, we collected a large cohort of patients with the aim to report the histological and radiological local response rates to neo-CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive adult patients treated between 2001 and 2016 in two French sarcoma referral centers (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, RESAP France and Gustave Roussy Institute France), for a histologically proved MFOS were included. Clinical, histological and radiological data were independently reviewed. Tumor response to neo-CT was assessed clinically, radiologically with independent review using RECIST v1.1 criterion and pathologically (percentage of necrosis). Multivariate analysis was done for outcomes, tumor response and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 35 high grade MFOS were collected. The clinical tumor response was 4% (1/24 receiving neo-CT), the radiological response was 0% (0/18 with available data) and the pathological response was 5% (1/20 with available data). Three patients (12.5%) initially resectable became unresectable due to clinical and radiological progression during neo-CT. Tumor size and R0 (clear margins) surgical resections were significantly associated with DFS. CONCLUSION: MFOS is a rare disease. This large retrospective cohort of MFOS indicates the lack of benefit and potentially deleterious effects of neo-CT. We suggest privileging primary surgery in initially localized resectable MFOS. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy should be prospectively studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouaoud et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: