PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 11, 2025Nature20 citationsOpen Access

SP140–RESIST pathway regulates interferon mRNA stability and antiviral immunity

KWKristen C. WittADAdam DziulkoJAJoohyun An

Key Result

SP140 negatively regulates Ifnb1 mRNA stability by repressing RESIST, which counteracts mRNA destabilization by the CCR4-NOT complex, and independently inhibits MHV68 viral replication.

Structured PICO

P
Population
C57BL/6J (B6), Sp140-/-, Ifnar-/-, Sp140-/-Ifnar-/-, and Sp140-/-Resist1-/-Resist2-/- mice, bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs), and human BlaER1 monocytes.
I
Intervention
Genetic manipulation of SP140 and RESIST (Resist1/2) pathways, including CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts and overexpression, combined with immune stimulation (DMXAA, poly(I:C), LPS, ADU-S100) or L. pneumophila infection.
C
Comparator
Wild-type (B6) controls, untreated cells, or non-targeting guide RNAs.
O
Outcome
Ifnb1 mRNA stability, Ifnb1 transcript levels, IFNβ protein levels, and L. pneumophila replication (CFU).surrogate

This study identifies the SP140-RESIST pathway as a critical regulator of Type I interferon mRNA stability and antiviral immunity, providing mechanistic insights into immune regulation.

Limitations

  • The mechanism by which SP140 is antiviral remains unclear.
  • Whether RESIST regulates other transcripts in vivo requires further work.
  • Validation of predicted interactions between RESIST and CCR4-NOT requires structural analyses.

Abstract

Abstract Type I interferons are essential for antiviral immunity 1 but must be tightly regulated 2 . The conserved transcriptional repressor SP140 inhibits interferon-β ( Ifnb1 ) expression through an unknown mechanism 3,4 . Here we report that SP140 does not directly repress Ifnb1 transcription. Instead, SP140 negatively regulates Ifnb1 mRNA stability by directly repressing the expression of a previously uncharacterized regulator that we call RESIST (regulated stimulator of interferon via stabilization of transcript; previously annotated as annexin 2 receptor). RESIST promotes Ifnb1 mRNA stability by counteracting Ifnb1 mRNA destabilization mediated by the tristetraprolin (TTP) family of RNA-binding proteins and the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex. SP140 localizes within punctate structures called nuclear bodies that have important roles in silencing DNA-virus gene expression in the nucleus 3 . Consistent with this observation, we find that SP140 inhibits replication of the gammaherpesvirus MHV68. The antiviral activity of SP140 is independent of its ability to regulate Ifnb1 . Our results establish dual antiviral and interferon regulatory functions for SP140. We propose that SP140 and RESIST participate in antiviral effector-triggered immunity 5,6 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Witt et al. (2025) studied Antiviral immunity. SP140 and RESIST genetic manipulation vs. Wild-type controls was evaluated on Ifnb1 mRNA stability and viral replication. SP140 negatively regulates Ifnb1 mRNA stability by repressing RESIST, which counteracts mRNA destabilization by the CCR4-NOT complex, and independently inhibits MHV68 viral replication.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa019c71cf0e01ec7babbd6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09152-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper