δ¹⁸O of metamorphosed chert from a thick sequence of chert and iron formation at Isukasia, west Greenland ranges from +12.9 to +20.4‰. Rocks at this locality satisfy three criteria suggesting that isotope exchange occurred only in a limited volume of material. It is our conclusion that the maximum observed δ¹⁸O of metamorphosed chert of 20.4‰ may be close to the sedimentary or diagenetic oxygen isotope composition of this rock. Magnetite δ¹⁸O ranges from +1.1 to +7.6‰ and the mean quartz-magnetite oxygen isotope fractionation (ΔQM) is 11.6 indicating a mean temperature of metamorphism of about 390°C. Extrapolation of data assuming closed system metamorphic conditions suggests an initial δ¹⁸O for magnetite or its precursor oxide of -8.7‰ or lower. If this is so, ΔQM during diagenesis or sedimentation was 28.9 or more, and the corresponding temperature was about 100°C or less. A review of published isotope data on the Proterozoic Biwabik/Gunflint and Hamersley Iron Formations indicates probable primary δ¹⁸OQ values of 24‰ for these rocks, and a primary quartz-magnetite oxygen isotope fractionation of about 39. The temperature of the oceans in which these 2,000 m.y. old iron formations were deposited thus is estimated to have been about 22°C. Evidence is strong that ancient cherts are depleted in 18O compared to modern cherts and that this phenomenon is not entirely the result of metamorphism. Whether caused by a surface temperature difference or differing δ¹⁸O of the ocean, the ¹⁸O content of chert seems to have begun to increase significantly about 2,500-2,700 m.y. ago, a time at which ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios in sedimentary rocks and Na₂O/K₂O ratios in crustal igneous rocks also changed. We suggest that δ¹⁸O of the early ocean was controlled by weathering and/or low temperature hydrothermal alteration of volcanic rocks and that recycling of these volcanic rocks as tonalitic gneisses may be primarily responsible for the increase in δ¹⁸O of crustal igneous rocks from about +6 to about +8.5‰.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perry et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: