The determination of dithiocarbamates in plant matrixes is generally carried out by spectrophotometric (European Norm EN 12396-1, 1996) or gas chromatography headspace (European Norm EN 12396-2, 1999) methods. However, the former method presents a risk of carbon disulfide loss during hydrolysis and distillation and its sensitivity is low, whereas the latter method is time-consuming. In comparison to these European methods and in compliance with norm V03-110, we have developed an automated gas chromatography headspace method. This method offers a good level of accuracy and precision and is specific to the compound determined (CS(2)). The limit of detection is below 0.020 mg/kg and the limit of quantification is below 0.050 mg/kg. Moreover, the recovery rates are between 85 and 103% with RSD less than 20%. The automated headspace method has several advantages when compared to the spectrophotometric and manual headspace methods, including the reduction of reagents employed for extraction and a greater number of analyses achievable per day than the other methods (approximately 40 samples of food).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Royer et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: