Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes form modular assembly-lines, wherein each module governs the incorporation of a specific monomer into a short peptide product. Modules are comprised of one or more key domains, including adenylation (A) domains, which recognise and activate the monomer substrate; condensation (C) domains, which catalyse amide bond formation; and thiolation (T) domains, which shuttle reaction intermediates between catalytic domains. This arrangement offers prospects for rational peptide modification via substitution of substrate-specifying domains. For over 20 years, it has been considered that C domains play key roles in proof-reading the substrate; a presumption that has greatly complicated rational NRPS redesign. Here we present evidence from both directed and natural evolution studies that any substrate-specifying role for C domains is likely to be the exception rather than the rule, and that novel non-ribosomal peptides can be generated by substitution of A domains alone. We identify permissive A domain recombination boundaries and show that these allow us to efficiently generate modified pyoverdine peptides at high yields. We further demonstrate the transferability of our approach in the PheATE-ProCAT model system originally used to infer C domain substrate specificity, generating modified dipeptide products at yields that are inconsistent with the prevailing dogma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calcott et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: