Key result
Endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques over 16 weeks significantly improved general endurance by 2.80%, speed-strength endurance by 8.24%, and dynamic strength endurance by 18.77%.
Why the study?
Does the application of endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques improve general physical fitness in young swimmers?
Does the application of endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques improve general physical fitness in young swimmers?
The use of endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques in young swimmers provides a statistically significant increase in overall endurance, speed-strength endurance, and dynamic strength endurance.
May enhance endurance in young swimmers but should not change practice; leaves open need for RCTs.
Purpose: to examine the effect of general physical preparedness of young swimmers in the body artificially created state hypercapnic normobaric hypoxia. Material: the study involved 21 swimmer aged 13-14 years with sports qualifications at third and second sports categories. Results: the original method of working with young swimmers. Studies were conducted for 16 weeks a year preparatory period macrocycle. The average value of the index on the results of general endurance races 800m improved by 2.80 %. 8.24 % increased speed- strength endurance and 18.77 % increased dynamic strength endurance. During the period of formative experiment performance speed, agility, static endurance, flexibility and explosive strength athletes first experimental group was not significantly changed. Conclusions: it was found that the use of the proposed technique provides statistically significant increase in overall endurance, speed strength endurance and dynamic strength endurance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furman et al. (2014) studied Healthy young swimmers (n=21). Endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques was evaluated on General endurance (800m race), speed-strength endurance, and dynamic strength endurance. Endogenous hypoxic breathing techniques over 16 weeks significantly improved general endurance by 2.80%, speed-strength endurance by 8.24%, and dynamic strength endurance by 18.77%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: