This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Cystic fibrosis (CF), which is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), is characterised by chronic bacterial lung infection and inflammation. In CF, monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages have been shown to display defective phagocytosis and antimicrobial activity against relevant lung pathogens, includingPseudomonas aeruginosa. Thus, we addressed the effect of CFTR triple modulator therapy (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)) on the activity of CF monocytes againstP. aeruginosa. Methods Monocytes from people with CF (PWCF) before and after 1 and 6 months of ETI therapy were isolated from blood and infected withP. aeruginosato assess phagocytic activity and intracellular bacterial killing. The oxidative burst and interleukin-6 secretion were also determined. Monocytes from healthy controls were also included. Results Longitudinal analysis of the clinical parameters confirmed an improvement of lung function and lung microbiology by ETI. Both the phagocytic and microbicidal deficiencies of CF monocytes also improved significantly, although not completely. Furthermore, we measured an exuberant oxidative burst in CF monocytes before therapy, which was reduced considerably by ETI. This led to an improvement of reactive oxygen species-dependent bactericidal activity. Inflammatory response to bacterial stimuli was also lowered compared with pre-therapy. Conclusions PWCF on ETI therapy, in a real-life setting, in addition to clinical recovery, showed significant improvement in monocyte activity againstP. aeruginosa, which may have contributed to the overall effect of ETI on pulmonary disease. This also suggests that CF monocyte dysfunctions may be specifically targeted to ameliorate lung function in CF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavinato et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: