OBJECTIVE: Orthognathic wafers may be made using digital model movements and CAD-CAM technology. This paper analysed the accuracy of maxillary movements using this new process. DESIGN: Retrospective study of pre and post-operative cephalograms. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty consecutive orthognathic patients undergoing bimaxillary osteotomies in a UK hospital. METHODS: Jaw movements were planned using cephalometric and Orthoanalyzer™ software. The resultant intermediate and final wafer occlusal relationships were used for wafer fabrication by 3D printing of the inter-occlusal space. Pre- and post-operative lateral cephalograms were compared in terms of maxillary antero-posterior and vertical movements. Statistical analyses including the paired t-test, two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Wide individual variation was observed between the planned and actual movements. Thirteen cases (43%) had a 2 mm discrepancy in at least one variable. Statistically significant differences between the planned and actual maxillary vertical movements were observed for the molar (U6y: p < 0.0001) and anterior maxillary (Ay: p < 0.01) differences. Analysis of a subgroup with primarily impaction movements demonstrated a statistically significant bias towards excessive maxillary advancement (U1x: p < 0.01) and incisor impaction (U1y: p < 0.01) in this group. CONCLUSIONS: This new digital surgical wafer technique achieves a similar level of accuracy to the conventional facebow and model surgery process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cousley et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: