Key result
Transversus abdominis plane blocks did not significantly reduce total postoperative morphine consumption via patient-controlled analgesia compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy (median 27.0 mg vs 44.0 mg, p=0.111).
Why the study?
Transversus abdominis plane blocks and wound infiltration are commonly used regional analgesic techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but their comparative efficacy remains uncertain.
Does transversus abdominis plane block reduce postoperative morphine consumption compared to wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic hemicolectomy?
Case-Control (n=91)
No
Does transversus abdominis plane block reduce postoperative morphine consumption compared to wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic hemicolectomy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAP blocks do not significantly reduce postoperative opioid requirements compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy.
Introduction Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks and wound infiltration are commonly used regional analgesic techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, their comparative efficacy remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether TAP blocks reduce postoperative morphine consumption and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) duration compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study comparing postoperative opioid requirements and PCA duration in patients who received TAP blocks versus wound infiltration for laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Landmark vs ultrasound-guided TAP block techniques were also compared. The primary outcome was total postoperative morphine consumption via PCA, and the secondary outcome was PCA duration. Data on postoperative adjunct analgesia and patient demographics were also collected. Results Comparing TAP blocks (n=59) and wound infiltration (n=33), no significant difference was found between groups in postoperative morphine consumption via PCA (p=0.111), PCA duration (p=0.092), or average daily morphine requirement via PCA (p=0.452). Comparing ultrasound-guided (n=21) and landmark (n=38) TAP block techniques also yielded no significant difference between groups for each of these dependent variables. Variability in opioid use was high, with large standard deviations observed in all groups. Discussion TAP blocks did not demonstrate a significant opioid-sparing effect compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature with conflicting evidence on the efficacy of TAP blocks. However, TAP blocks may offer benefits beyond postoperative opioid-sparing effects. Further prospective studies incorporating postoperative pain scores and recovery metrics are needed to determine their clinical utility in multimodal analgesia protocols for colorectal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Postoperative pain following laparoscopic hemicolectomy (n=91). Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block vs. Wound infiltration was evaluated on Total postoperative morphine consumption via PCA (mg) (p=0.111). Transversus abdominis plane blocks did not significantly reduce total postoperative morphine consumption via patient-controlled analgesia compared to wound infiltration following laparoscopic hemicolectomy (median 27.0 mg vs 44.0 mg, p=0.111).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: