Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In attempts to produce a microporous magnet, two approaches were explored for expanding the Prussian blue structure type via incorporation of edge-bridged octahedral [Zr(6)ZCl(12)](2+) (Z = B, Be) cluster cores. Dissolution of Rb(5)Zr(6)BCl(18) and K(5)Zr(6)BeCl(15) in an acetonitrile solution of Et(4)N(CN) led to the isolation of (Et(4)N)(5)[Zr(6)BCl(12)(CN)(6)] (1) and (Et(4)N)(5)[Zr(6)BeCl(12)(CN)(6)].2MeCN.2THF (2), respectively. The crystal structure of 1.1.5MeCN revealed the expected cyano-terminated cluster complex with a trans-N...N span of 11.73(3) Angstroms. Unfortunately, both [Zr(6)ZCl(12)(CN)(6)](5-) clusters rapidly lose their cyanide ligands in aqueous solution making them ill-suited for solid-forming reactions with hydrated metal ions. Such outer-ligand exchange, however, allows the use of [Zr(6)BCl(18)](4-) in the synthesis of expanded Prussian blue-type solids through reactions with [Cr(CN)(6)](3-). The use of 2.2 M aqueous LiCl to stabilize the cluster during the reaction gave (Et(4)N)(2)[Zr(6)BCl(12)][Cr(CN)(6)]Cl.3H(2)O (3), while the use of 1 M acetic acid yielded (Et(4)N)(2)[Zr(6)BCl(12)][Cr(CN)(6)]Cl.2H(2)O.CH(3)CO(2)H (4). A Rietveld refinement against X-ray powder diffraction data collected for 3 confirmed the presence of a cubic Prussian blue framework structure, featuring alternating [Zr(6)BCl(12)](2+) cores and [Cr(CN)(6)](3-) anions. The temperature dependence of magnetization data obtained for 4 revealed activation of magnetic exchange interactions between the S = (1)/(2) cluster units and the S = (3)/(2) hexacyanochromate complexes below 10 K.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beauvais et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: