Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 25, 2021Biotechnology JournalOpen Access

Systematizing the different notions of growth‐coupled product synthesis and a single framework for computing corresponding strain designs

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PSPhilipp SchneiderHelmholtz Centre for Infection ResearchRMRadhakrishnan MahadevanUniversity of TorontoSKSteffen KlamtMax Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Schneider et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa03aa203e29c6012e9ec23https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202100236
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In silico design and adaptive evolution of <i>Escherichia coli</i> for production of lactic acid2005 · 366 citations
  2. 2Characterizing and ranking computed metabolic engineering strategies2019 · 28 citations
  3. 3F2C2: a fast tool for the computation of flux coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks2012 · 69 citations
  4. 4Production of 2,3-butanediol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by in silico aided metabolic engineering2012 · 164 citations
  5. 5Large-Scale Bi-Level Strain Design Approaches and Mixed-Integer Programming Solution Techniques2011 · 98 citations