This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Diagnostics are essential for understanding hepatitis E epidemiology, but the field performance of available tests remains unclear. We evaluated the performance of PCR, IgM ELISA, and the Assure HEV IgM rapid diagnostic test (RDT) during a HEV genotype 1 outbreak and assessed the duration of viremia and antibodies responses. Methods We used data from enhanced surveillance at a health facility in Bentiu internally displaced persons camp, South Sudan (March-December 2022). Suspected hepatitis E cases underwent testing with all three diagnostics at enrolment, with a follow-up sample collected as part of a vaccine effectivness study. We used a latent class model to estimate test performance and accelerated failure time models to estimate time from jaundice onset to a negative test for PCR and ELISA. Findings Among 893 suspected cases, test sensitivity declined with time from jaundice onset. Within 30 days of jaundice onset, PCR sensitivity was 73% (95% Credible Interval (CrI) 27, 90), compared to 86% for RDT (95% CrI: 74, 93), and 95% for ELISA (95% CrI: 91, 98). Specificity was high across tests: PCR at 98% (95% CrI: 98, 99), RDT at 95% (95% CrI: 93, 96), and ELISA at 95% (95% CrI: 93, 96). Median time from jaundice onset to negative test was 19 days (95% CI: 17, 21) for PCR and 113 days (95% CI: 87, 163) for ELISA. Interpretation The Assure RDT showed higher sensitivity than PCR and similar specificity to ELISA, supporting its use in surveillance. Care seeking delays can greatly influence the interpretation of diagnostic tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koyuncu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: