In the course of Merck's progress to post the results of clinical studies to the public website http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org (in compliance with guidelines under the US Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act [FDAAA]), a review of clinical trial data to be included in posting synopses uncovered a discrepancy between the clinical study report for montelukast Protocol 162 and the manuscript published in Clin Exp Allergy [1]. Specifically, we noticed the following discrepancy: In Table 1, the numbers for patient gender are reversed. The correct values are: Placebo: M=123; F=229 Montelukast: M=115; F=233 Loratadine: M=212; F=390 George Philip (on behalf of the authors of this manuscript).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: