Why the study?
What is the optimal duration and composition of dual antiplatelet therapy to balance ischemic and bleeding risks?
What is the optimal duration and composition of dual antiplatelet therapy to balance ischemic and bleeding risks?
Evolving evidence suggests that shorter duration (6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy may be safe and effective for patients with current generation drug-eluting stents, reducing bleeding without increasing ischemic risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support shorter DAPT in select patients with modern DES to limit bleeding; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review seeks to describe the emerging clinical trial data that informs clinical practice with regards to dual antiplatelet therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence with vorapaxar has demonstrated an increase in bleeding events with only modest improvement in ischemic outcomes. Platelet function testing to inform clopidogrel dose selection has not shown improvement in clinical outcome. The impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles on clopidogrel effect may be more modest than initially reported, though an impact on stent thrombosis is evident. Among patients receiving current generation drug eluting stents, 6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy may provide similar ischemic outcomes with fewer bleeding events compared with 12 or 24 months of therapy. Novel anticoagulants entering clinical practice will also potentially influence the clinical decisions regarding the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. Studies focussing on the discontinuation of aspirin as opposed to the P2Y12 inhibitor to reduce late bleeding risk should be considered. SUMMARY: Evolving evidence and new therapies may enable shorter duration dual antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chew et al. (2012) conducted a review in Patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy vs. 12 or 24 months of therapy was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: