Key result
Probiotics significantly reduce hs-CRP and oxidative stress compared with placebo in CAD patients.
Why the study?
Coronary artery disease is closely linked with chronic inflammation, but the role of probiotic supplementation in modulating inflammatory responses in CAD patients remains unclear.
Does probiotic or synbiotic supplementation improve inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in adult patients with coronary artery disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=256)
Does probiotic or synbiotic supplementation improve inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in adult patients with coronary artery disease?
This meta-analysis provides the first pooled RCT evidence that probiotic and synbiotic supplementation significantly reduces systemic inflammation (hs-CRP) and oxidative stress (MDA) in patients with coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Probiotics merit consideration as adjunct therapy in CAD; first pooled RCT evidence extends prior trials on biomarker reduction.
Coronary artery disease (CAD), a major contributor to healthcare burdens worldwide, is closely linked with chronic inflammation. Probiotic supplementation has been investigated for its potential to modulate inflammatory responses, yet its role in patients with CAD remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, with literature searches performed across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 19 March 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics in patients with CAD or ischemic heart disease. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for pooled outcomes. A total of five randomized controlled trials involving 256 patients with CAD were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvements in inflammatory biomarkers among participants receiving probiotics compared with those in the placebo group. Specifically, probiotic supplementation led to greater reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (pooled SMD [pSMD] = -0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.87 to -0.36) and malondialdehyde (pSMD = -0.52; 95% CI: -0.91 to -0.12). No significant increase was observed in nitric oxide (pSMD = 0.91; 95% CI: -3.72 to 5.54) or total antioxidant capacity (pSMD = 0.35; 95% CI: -2.16 to 2.86) in the intervention group over control. No significant difference was found in glutathione levels between the two groups (pSMD = 0.01; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.53). Overall, these findings suggest that probiotic supplementation exerts a beneficial effect on inflammatory status in patients with CAD. The evidence highlights its potential in reducing systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, as reflected by improvements in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and malondialdehyde.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiou et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease (n=256). Probiotic or synbiotic supplementation vs. Placebo or no active treatment was evaluated on Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.36). Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.36) and malondialdehyde (SMD -0.52) compared with placebo in patients with CAD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: