Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On-farm trials demonstrate limited nutritional improvements and no yield increases from foliar inoculants in hazelnut and walnut trees, suggesting commercial recommendations are premature.
This study presents the results of two on-farm trials evaluating the efficacy of a nitrogen (N)-fixing inoculant (Methylobacterium symbioticum) applied as a foliar spray to provide N to hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) and walnut (Juglans regia L.) trees. In the hazelnut trial, a factorial design was employed with soil N application at three levels [0 (N0), 40 (N40), and 80 (N80) kg ha−1] and foliar application of the inoculant (Yes and No). The walnut trial was arranged as a completely randomized design with three treatments: the N-fixing microorganism, a seaweed extract, and a control. Soil N application significantly increased hazelnut yield in 2021 (1.99, 2.49, and 2.65 t ha−1 for N0, N40, and N80, respectively) but not in 2022 (average values ranging from 0.28 to 0.33 t ha−1). The inoculant application did not significantly affect hazelnut yield. In the walnut trial, no significant differences were observed among the treatments in either year. The average yields ranged from 1.72 to 2.38 t ha−1 in 2021 and 0.66 to 0.84 t ha−1 in 2022. Soil N application in hazelnuts tended to increase leaf N concentration and significantly increased kernel N concentration. The inoculant increased leaf N concentration in one of the three sampling dates but did not affect kernel N concentration. In walnuts, the inoculant did not increase leaf N concentration but significantly increased kernel N concentration in one of the two years. The seaweed extract did not influence walnut yield or leaf N concentration. None of the treatments in either trial consistently affected the concentration of other macronutrients and micronutrients in the leaves. Therefore, while the inoculant showed some potential to improve the N nutritional status of the trees, it did not affect the yield. Overall, the results of the inoculant application were not sufficiently compelling, indicating the need for further studies on these species before the commercial product can be confidently recommended to farmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arrobas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: