Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formal policy agreements between governments and major peak associations—social pacts—are a useful way to explore issues of election-induced variation in economic policymaking. I argue that pacts are part of an electoral strategy for political parties. They are one way a party can convince voters that economic outcomes under its rule will be better than those under a challenger. I show that pacts can emerge as part of equilibrium behavior in a repeated game but only if the policymaker is sufficiently willing to work with unions. There is no reason for a pact to exist in the absence of electoral incentives. I hypothesize that pacts are more likely to be struck nearer to elections and with greater Left participation in government. Using an original dataset on social pacts in the OECD, 1974–2000, I find evidence that the onset of pacts is related to elections, partisanship, and EMU convergence pressures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John S. Ahlquist (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: