Key result
The TAXUS Liberté stent significantly reduced the 3-year risk of target lesion revascularization by 66% in small vessels and myocardial infarction by 75% in long lesions compared with the TAXUS Express stent.
Why the study?
Does the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent improve 3-year clinical outcomes compared to the TAXUS Express stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions, including small vessels and long lesions?
Cohort (n=2,478)
Yes
Does the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent improve 3-year clinical outcomes compared to the TAXUS Express stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions, including small vessels and long lesions?
Hazard Ratio: 0.34 (95% CI 0.17–0.66)
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 22.1%
p-value: p=0.001
The thinner-strut TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent provides durable 3-year reductions in restenosis for small vessels and myocardial infarction for long lesions compared to the older TAXUS Express stent.
May support Liberté preference in small vessels and long lesions; extends observational comparisons but leaves open randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The long-term impact of treating de novo coronary lesions in native vessels and challenging small vessel and long lesion subsets with TAXUS Liberté stents is unknown. This report examines the 3-year efficacy and safety from the TAXUS ATLAS program. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS ATLAS WH, Small Vessel, and Long Lesion are non-randomized studies comparing TAXUS Liberté (n = 871), TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm (n = 261), and TAXUS Liberté 38 mm (n = 150) stents, respectively, to case-matched TAXUS Express historical controls. TAXUS Liberté demonstrated comparable 3-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (19.0% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.51) in de novo lesions, reduced target lesion revascularization (TLR, 10.0% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.008) in small vessels, and reduced myocardial infarction (MI, 2.9% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.01) and stent thrombosis (ST, 0.0% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.03) in long lesions vs. TAXUS Express. After propensity score adjustment, no statistically significant effect of TAXUS Liberté on TLR (9.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.12) in small vessels or MI (2.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.05) in long lesions was noted, although reduced ST (0.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.02) remained in long lesions. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that TAXUS Liberté treatment significantly reduced TLR by 66% in small vessels, and MI by 75% in long lesions, vs. TAXUS Express. CONCLUSIONS: TAXUS Liberté suggests durable 3-year effectiveness in reducing restenosis and improved clinical outcomes in small vessels and long lesions compared with TAXUS Express.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ormiston et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in De novo coronary lesions (n=2,478). TAXUS Liberté stent vs. TAXUS Express stent was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) in small vessels at 3 years (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.66, p=0.001). The TAXUS Liberté stent significantly reduced the 3-year risk of target lesion revascularization by 66% in small vessels and myocardial infarction by 75% in long lesions compared with the TAXUS Express stent.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: