Why the study?
While different neuroimaging modalities have been proposed to detect mental stress, each individual modality experiences certain limitations.
Does the fusion of EEG and fNIRS signals using jICA and CCA improve the detection rate of mental stress compared to individual modalities?
Does the fusion of EEG and fNIRS signals using jICA and CCA improve the detection rate of mental stress compared to individual modalities?
p-value: p=<0.05
The fusion of EEG and fNIRS signals using advanced feature-level techniques significantly improves the accuracy of mental stress detection compared to single-modality approaches.
Hypothesis-generating for EEG-fNIRS fusion in stress detection; leaves open clinical utility pending validation.
While different neuroimaging modalities have been proposed to detect mental stress, each modality experiences certain limitations. This study proposed novel approaches to detect stress based on fusion of EEG and fNIRS signals in the feature-level using joint independent component analysis (jICA) and canonical correlation analysis method (CCA) and predected the level of stress using machine-learning approach. The jICA and CCA were then developed to combine the features to detect mental stress. The jICA fusion scheme discovers relationships between modalities by utilizing ICA to identify sources from each modality that modulate in the same way across subjects. The CCA fuse information from two sets of features to discover the associations across modalities and to ultimately estimate the sources responsible for these associations. The study further explored the functional connectivity (FC) and evaluated the performance of the fusion methods based on their classification performance and compared it with the result obtained by each individual modality. The jICA fusion technique significantly improved the classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity on average by +3.46% compared to the EEG and +11.13% compared to the fNIRS. Similarly, CCA method improved the classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity on average by +8.56% compared to the EEG and +13.03% compared to the fNIRS, respectively. The overall performance of the proposed fusion methods significantly improved the detection rate of mental stress, p<0.05. The FC significantly reduced under stress and suggested EEG and fNIRS as a potential biomarker of stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fares Al-Shargie (2019) studied Mental stress (n=25). Fusion of EEG and fNIRS signals (jICA and CCA) vs. Individual EEG and fNIRS modalities was evaluated on Classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of mental stress detection (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: