The motion of the Instron crosshead during small deformations (e. g. 0.25 mm) in tensile tests performed at the available range of deformation rates was examined. Large errors are introduced in the deformation readings if it is assumed that the deformation rate was constant at the rate selected because, as with any instrument of this type, the crosshead requires time to accelerate to the selected speed. The characteristic behaviour of the food is subject to misinterpretation if the applied deformation profile is unknown. It was found that the errors are larger when the instrument is used incorrectly by performing tensile tests below the crosshead. The work demonstrated some of the limitations that must be recognized when applying the Instron, or any deformation mechanism, to certain texture tests. It is concluded that food behaviour, under small deformations, could be recorded precisely and interpreted correctly providing that both the force and deformation are recorded against time. Control of the crosshead stopping and reversal points was also examined, particularly in relation to the instrumental texture profile analysis. Crosshead acceleration affects the readings and interpretation of the data at the reversal point. If the deformation rate is changed, the stopping point must be adjusted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voisey et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: