Key result
Caregiver-assisted home nocturnal hemodialysis showed no significant difference in time to first hospitalization, technique failure, or death versus independent patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.76-2.04).
Why the study?
Does caregiver assistance affect outcomes in patients undergoing home nocturnal hemodialysis?
Cohort (n=152)
No
Does caregiver assistance affect outcomes in patients undergoing home nocturnal hemodialysis?
Hazard Ratio: 1.25 (95% CI 0.76–2.04)
Caregiver-assisted home nocturnal hemodialysis has similar outcomes to independent HNHD after adjusting for case mix, suggesting caregiver need should not deter HNHD use.
Caregiver assistance showed no outcome difference in home nocturnal hemodialysis; extends case-mix adjusted observations but leaves open randomized validation.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Home nocturnal hemodialysis (HNHD) has several benefits. However, patients that require caregiver assistance for dialysis may be at risk for poor outcomes. In an effort to determine if HNHD can be extended to assisted patients, an analysis of their outcomes is important. METHODS: We examined a single-center cohort of patients that started and completed HNHD training between 01 January 2003 and 31 December 2010 (last follow-up 01 July 2011). Patients were classified as 'dependent' if they required caregiver assistance for dialysis. The primary outcome was time to first hospitalization, technique failure, or death for dependent versus independent patients. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization rate and hospital days. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included in this study. Dependent patients (n = 47) were older (51 vs. 42 years), more likely to have diabetic end-stage renal disease (26 vs. 8%) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (4 vs. 3) compared to independent patients (n = 105). In an adjusted analysis there was no significant difference in the time to composite outcome for dependent versus independent patients (relative hazard 1.25; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.76-2.04). Adjusted incidence rate ratios for hospitalizations (1.58; 95% CI 0.95-2.65) and hospital days (1.84; 95% CI 0.78-4.34) were not significantly different for dependent versus independent patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that outcomes of caregiver-assisted versus independent HNHD patients are likely driven by differences in case mix. The need for caregiver assistance alone should not be a deterrent to HNHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tennankore et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in End-stage renal disease requiring home nocturnal hemodialysis (n=152). Caregiver assistance for home nocturnal hemodialysis vs. Independent home nocturnal hemodialysis was evaluated on Time to first hospitalization, technique failure, or death (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.76-2.04). Caregiver-assisted home nocturnal hemodialysis showed no significant difference in time to first hospitalization, technique failure, or death versus independent patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.76-2.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: