Abbott’s formula may be used to correct bioassay data for control response and has become a standard in bioassay evaluation. Although Abbott’s formula provides an estimate of pˉcorr (the mean bioassay treatment response corrected for control response), it does not provide a measure of associated variance. The current practice of retaining the variance estimate for pˉcorr (the mean bioassay treatment response not corrected for control response) and applying it to pˉcorr is invalid. This invalid procedure results in an exaggeration of the reliability of the estimate of pˉcorr and a confidence interval for pˉcorr that is centered around an inappropriate value. We present a technique to incorporate a correction for control response into the statistical analysis of bioassays conducted with only a single or small number of treatments, which may be qualitative classes rather than a series of doses. The proposed solution is based upon established techniques for estimating the variance or confidence interval of a ratio of normally distributed variables. The analysis suggests two implications for bioassay experimental design and evaluation: first, the optimal allocation of bioassay replications to control and experimental treatments generally occurs when the number of experimental replications is equal to or slightly greater than the number of control replications, and second, bioassay data should be corrected for control mortality more frequently than is currently recommended. Only if such a correction has negligible effects on both pˉcorr and Var(pˉcorr) can it be safely omitted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenheim et al. (1989) studied this question.