Key result
MCS shows no in-hospital mortality benefit over medical therapy in AMI mechanical complications.
Why the study?
Does mechanical circulatory support reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=7,025)
Yes
Does mechanical circulatory support reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite increasing use, mechanical circulatory support was not associated with improved in-hospital mortality in patients with mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction in this observational cohort.
AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the trends and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use among patients with mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (a large admirative database in the USA) years 2016-20, we identified AMI admissions (ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) with mechanical complications (ventricular septal defect, free wall rupture, or papillary muscle rupture). Among 4 450 219 AMI patients, 7025 (0.2%) had a mechanical complication of which 3115 patients (44.3%) received at least one MCS device. There was a rising trend in MCS use (39.3% in 2016 to 48.9% in 2020, Ptrend = 0.02), but there was no corresponding reduction in the incidence of in-hospital mortality (36.9% in 2016 vs. 43.4% in 2020, Ptrend = 0.75). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between those who received MCS vs. those who did not (48.4 vs. 34.5%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this large observational analysis of AMI hospitalizations, mechanical complications were rare and associated with very high in-hospital mortality. Although the use of MCS has increased, in-hospital mortality rates remain high even among patients who received MCS. Further investigations are needed to clarify the role of MCS devices among patients with mechanical complications of AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younes et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (n=7,025). Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) vs. No mechanical circulatory support was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Mechanical circulatory support use in patients with AMI mechanical complications showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to no MCS (48.4% vs. 34.5%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: