Retrospective study reveals modest sensitivity of 24-hour urine free cortisol mass spectrometry in Cushing's disease, highlighting the need for multiple tests.
PURPOSE: Cushing's disease (CD) is a rare disorder of endogenous hypercortisolism arising from a corticotroph adenoma and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Measurement of 24-h urine free cortisol (UFC) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a recommended first-line screening test. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of newly established, sex-specific UFC LC-MS/MS reference ranges in a surgical cohort of patients with CD. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of adults undergoing pituitary surgery for confirmed CD at a tertiary center between June 2021 and July 2025. All patients met clinical, biochemical, and radiological criteria for CD. UFC was quantified using an accredited LC-MS/MS assay, according to recently published, sex-specific, optimized reference intervals. Sensitivity of both urine volume-corrected (VC-UFC; nmol/day) and uncorrected (U-UFC; nmol/L) reference ranges were assessed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (UFC measurements: 28 measurements from 13 females and 8 measurements from 3 males) met inclusion criteria; 88% had histologic confirmation of corticotroph adenoma. Sensitivity of any single UFC measure for CD was 78% (95% CI 61% to 90%); 75% for males (95% CI 25% to 97%) and 79% for females (95% CI 59% to 92%) for VC-UFC and 56% (95% CI 38% to 72%); 88% for males (95% CI 47% to 100%) and 46% for females (95% CI 28% to 66%) for U-UFC. CONCLUSION: Despite use of LC-MS/MS and rigorously validated reference ranges, UFC demonstrated only modest sensitivity for detecting CD. These findings underscore the limitations of single UFC as a screening test and support the need for multiple collections and complementary biochemical assessments in suspected CD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lithgow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: