Key result
Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine resulted in significantly higher sedation scores and lower heart rates compared to clonidine during supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
Why the study?
Several adjuvant drugs have been used with local anesthetics in supraclavicular brachial plexus block, but the comparative sedation and cardiorespiratory effects of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine remained to be defined.
Does dexmedetomidine compared to clonidine added to ropivacaine affect sedation and cardiorespiratory parameters in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery with supraclavicular brachial plexus block?
RCT (n=80)
Double-blind
Simple randomization (flipping a coin)
No
Does dexmedetomidine compared to clonidine added to ropivacaine affect sedation and cardiorespiratory parameters in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery with supraclavicular brachial plexus block?
Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for supraclavicular block provides better conscious sedation than clonidine, with manageable hemodynamic effects and no respiratory depression.
Dexmedetomidine may deepen sedation with greater hemodynamic effects than clonidine; leaves open optimal adjuvant choice pending larger trials.
Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block is widely used peripheral nerve block technique used for surgery of the upper extremity. Several drugs have been used with local anesthetic as adjuvants for rapid, dense, and prolonged analgesia. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the degree of sedation and cardiorespiratory effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Materials and Methods: A double-blinded comparative study was done on eighty patients who were randomly allocated equally into two groups and received clonidine and dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine 0.5%. Intraoperative degree of sedation and cardiorespiratory parameters were monitored in regular intervals and compared to find difference. Results: Heart rate was consistently lower with dexmedetomidine. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were comparable in both groups at all time points except at 45 min when diastolic and MAP were lower with dexmedetomidine and it was statistically significant. Sedation score in Group D was higher except at 5 min and difference was statistically significant. All patients in both groups were sedated and easily arousable. There was statistically significant difference in peroperative oxygen saturation between the groups although it was clinically not significant. Conclusion: There was more hemodynamic effect of dexmedetomidine than clonidine but these effects can be managed by medication easily. In addition to this, it was found that dexmedetomidine provides conscious sedation without any respiratory depression. Comparing the risk and benefit dexmedetomidine can be used with local anesthetic in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandal et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Upper extremity surgery requiring supraclavicular brachial plexus block (n=80). Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine vs. 1 µg/kg body weight clonidine with 30 mL ropivacaine 0.5% was evaluated on Sedation score at 30 minutes (p=0.001). Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine resulted in significantly higher sedation scores and lower heart rates compared to clonidine during supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: