Key result
This editorial discusses the complexities of interpreting meta-analyses regarding the long-term safety and mortality risks of first-generation drug-eluting stents in PCI patients.
Why the study?
Does the implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents increase mortality and late-stent thrombosis in PCI patients?
Does the implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents increase mortality and late-stent thrombosis in PCI patients?
This editorial highlights the complexities and importance of interpreting large meta-analyses regarding the long-term safety and mortality risks associated with first-generation drug-eluting stents.
During the World Congress of Cardiology 2006 in Barcelona, concerns regarding the long-term safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been voiced based on meta-analyses including numbers large enough to relate statistical significance to low incidence events such as late-stent thrombosis and mortality in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients. Since then, these potential safety issues have commanded widespread attention from the medical community, health care providers, regulatory bodies, the press, and the public. Interpretation of compiled data sets, formally as meta-analyses or pooled with any statistical methods, is fraught with complexities, in particular in trying to understand relevance to daily clinical practice. Across variations in study inclusion criteria, adjunctive therapies and endpoint definitions, DES studies are notable for such complexity. Nonetheless, it is essential that large and relevant data are published and the two analyses of mortality outcome in patients receiving DES reported back-to-back in this issue of the Journal bear consideration in the larger question of long-term DES safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijns et al. (2006) conducted an editorial in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). First generation drug-eluting stents (DES) was evaluated on Late-stent thrombosis and mortality. This editorial discusses the complexities of interpreting meta-analyses regarding the long-term safety and mortality risks of first-generation drug-eluting stents in PCI patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: