Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Diffusion coefficients for Cu(II), D Cu , were determined at 25°C in 0.51 M H 2 SO 4 over the concentration range 0.4 m M – 1.0 M CuSO 4 . The reported values of D Cu represent average values for the physical properties over the diffusion layer, and for the diffusing Cu(II) species, which consist of Cu ++ ions and Cu + + SO 4 = ion pairs. Thus, D Cu represents an effective value that is suitable for substitution into the various mass‐transfer equations derived by assuming constant properties. At low CuSO 4 concentrations (0.4–6 m M ) static mercury drop electrode (SMDE) polarography using a modified version of the Cottrell equation with a spherical correction term was used to determine D Cu . At higher CuSO 4 concentrations D Cu was determined chronopotentiometrically using the Sand equation. The values of D Cu in 0.51 M aqueous H 2 SO 4 at 25°C were as follows For CuSO 4 0 < 0.002 M : D Cu = 5.83 ± 0.08 1 × 10 − 6 cm 2 s − 1 , For 0.002 M < CuSO 4 0 < 1.0 M : 10 6 × D Cu = 6.33 + 2.69 log CuSO 4 0 + 1.62 log 2 CuSO 4 0 + 0.256 log 2 CuSO 4 0 where [ CuSO 4 ] 0 is the stoichiometric concentration of CuSO 4 (mol liter −1 ). At the higher CuSO 4 concentrations estimates were made of the effects of migration on the measured values of D Cu . Transport number calculations, although nonrigorous, indicate that these effects are relatively minor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinatsu et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: