Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Bo Chen 1 , Yu Zhao 1 , Jiangang Gu 1 , Huanwen Wu 1 , Zhiyong Liang 1 , Zhilan Meng 1 1 Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China Correspondence to: Zhilan Meng, email: mengzhl2015@163.com Keywords: endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, risk of malignancy, risk stratification, pancreas Received: October 27, 2016 Accepted: November 23, 2016 Published: December 22, 2016 ABSTRACT The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has recently proposed a standardized terminology and nomenclature guidelines for pancreatic cytology. However the risk of malignancy associated with the new guidelines has been scarcely studied. In this study, a series of pancreatic cytology cases obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration from 294 Chinese patients were retrospectively re-categorized into six categories according the new guidelines. The risks of malignancy were 18.1% for “negative,” 20.0% for “neoplastic,” 57.1% for “nondiagnostic,” 69.2% for “atypical,” 87.5% for “suspicious,” and 100.0% for “positive” respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval, 0.90-0.96), which was significantly higher than that associated with old classification system (0.82; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.77-0.87) conventionally used in China. Our investigation demonstrated that the new guidelines have a greater ability of risk stratification than the old classification system conventionally used in China. This may be helpful in giving better predictions of malignancy, thus leading to more personalized treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: