Key result
Female sex was not associated with increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 0.99) or worse 3-month functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy compared to male sex, irrespective of prior antiplatelet use.
Why the study?
This study evaluated whether sex differences exist in clinical outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy in patients with prior antiplatelet use.
Does sex influence the safety and functional outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with prior antiplatelet use?
Cohort (n=7,472)
Yes
Does sex influence the safety and functional outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with prior antiplatelet use?
Odds Ratio: 0.99 (95% CI 0.77–1.28)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.6% vs 4.4%
p-value: p=0.96
There is no significant interaction between patient sex and prior antiplatelet use regarding safety and functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy, supporting a uniform decision-making approach for both sexes.
Supports equivalent thrombectomy safety in women and men irrespective of antiplatelets; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
Introduction: This study assessed sex differences in outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with prior antiplatelet use using the EVA-TRISP multinational registry. Patients and methods: A cohort of consecutive patients (2015–2023) treated with MT was analysed by sex and prior antiplatelet use in multivariable logistic regression models. Primary outcomes were in-hospital symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Results: Among 7472 patients (47.9% females, older than males: 77 vs 72 years, p < 0.0001), sICH rates were similar (females 4.6%, males 4.4%, p = 0.405). The odds of sICH were not influenced by sex (adjusted odds ratio, aOR, 0.99, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.77–1.28) or prior antiplatelet use (single therapy: aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.95–1.73; dual therapy: aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.29–2.31). No significant interactions were found between sex and antiplatelet use (p = 0.73 for single, p = 0.71 for dual therapy). Females had worse 3-month ordinal mRS scores than males (p < 0.0001), but the odds of a higher mRS score were not associated with sex (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93–1.13) or prior antiplatelet use (single: aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91–1.16; dual: aOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82–1.64). No interactions were found between sex and antiplatelet use for mRS (p = 0.78 for single, p = 0.29 for dual therapy). Discussion and conclusions: This study showed that there is no apparent interaction between patient sex and prior use of antiplatelets in relation to safety and functional outcomes of MT. Therefore, there is no reason to support a different decision-making approach by practicing physicians regarding MT in females and males previously taking antiplatelets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noseda et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=7,472). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on In-hospital symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.77-1.28, p=0.96). Female sex was not associated with increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR 0.99) or worse 3-month functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy compared to male sex, irrespective of prior antiplatelet use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: