Key result
Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms provides objective results equivalent to traditional CTG for maternal and perinatal outcomes and may save hospital time in the antepartum period.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to present the rationale, features, and implementation of computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) and the SisPorto system.
Does computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) improve maternal and perinatal outcomes or save time compared to traditional CTG analysis in pregnant women?
Does computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) improve maternal and perinatal outcomes or save time compared to traditional CTG analysis in pregnant women?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms offers an objective alternative to traditional analysis with equivalent clinical outcomes and potential time savings in the antepartum period.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to present the why, what and how about computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) and the SisPorto system for cCTG. CONTENT: A narrative review about cCTG and the SisPorto system for cCTG is presented. The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) performed so far have evidenced that cCGT compared to traditional CTG analysis may save time spent in hospital for women, in the antepartum period, and is objective with at least equivalent results in maternal and perinatal outcomes, both in the ante and intrapartum periods. The SisPorto system for cCTG closely follows the FIGO guidelines for fetal monitoring. It may be used both in the ante and intrapartum periods, alone or connected to a central monitoring station, with simultaneous monitoring of fetal and maternal signals, not only in singletons but also in twins. It has been assessed in technical, physiopathological and clinical studies, namely in one large multicentric international RCT during labor and two meta-analysis. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK: There is evidence that cCTG may be useful in clinical practice with advantages compared to traditional CTG analysis, although without clear impact on the decrease of preventable maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. More studies are warranted, namely on technical improvements and assessment in larger studies in a wider range of clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
João Bernardes (2022) conducted a review in Fetal monitoring. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) and the SisPorto system vs. Traditional CTG analysis was evaluated. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms provides objective results equivalent to traditional CTG for maternal and perinatal outcomes and may save hospital time in the antepartum period.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: