This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility of several parameters of the ADC measurement by calculating the scan-to-scan intrasubject variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed using a gradient-echo sequence with a bipolar gradient for diffusion weighting (b=3.89 sec/cm2). Five patients with pulmonary emphysema, and six healthy-lung volunteers were included in the study. Images were acquired after inspiration of 3He during a single inspiratory breath-hold. To assess the reproducibility, the measurement was performed twice (time between measurements=20 minutes) without repositioning the subjects. Analysis was performed on the basis of region-of-interest (ROI) analysis and global lung ADC histograms. RESULTS: The mean ADC of a ROI varied by 5.1% between two measurements for volunteers and by 6.1% for patients. In the global evaluation, the 75th percentile demonstrated the best reproducibility (2%), while other parameters showed variations up to 12%. Only the variation of the standard deviation (SD) and the measure of homogeneity of the ADC map showed a significant difference between patients and volunteers. CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a well-reproducible method for assessing the lung microstructure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morbach et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: