Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nucleation kinetics in the cooling crystallization of hexahydro‐1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazine (RDX) from γ‐butyrolactone was studied by converting total counts/s measured by in situ focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) into number of crystals. The classical nucleation rate model, which is derived exclusively from the thermodynamic state for the nucleation and molecular collision frequency, was found to be inadequate to describe the experimentally measured nucleation rates. However, the nucleation rates predicted by the modified classical nucleation rate model, inclusive of an additional temperature term, were found to be in good agreement with those measured in the present work. Furthermore, the metastable zone widths are also found to be more accurately predicted by the modified classical nucleation rate model than the classical approach, which assumes that the mass‐based nucleation rate is an exponential function of supersaturation and is equal to the supersaturation rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: