Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Visible light photocatalysis using water-soluble tin porphyrin ( s -SnP, [Sn(OH 2 ) 2 (TPy H P)](NO 3 ) 6 ) and water-insoluble tin porphyrin Sn(OH) 2 (TPP) ( ins -SnP) immobilized on SiO 2 ( hetero -SnP) was investigated. The visible light photocatalytic activities of s -SnP and hetero -SnP were demonstrated successfully for the degradation of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) and acid orange 7 (AO7) in water. The visible light activity of hetero -SnP increased with the ins -SnP loading and was saturated above 77 mg/g-SiO 2, which corresponded to the homogeneous concentration of [ ins -SnP] = 50 μM. It is the Q band of SnP (500−650 nm) that is photocatalytically active under visible light, not the Soret band (420−430 nm) whose absorption intensity is much higher. When applied to the degradation of 4-CP and AO7, hetero -SnP was particularly stable and could be used repeatedly without losing the activity whereas the activity of s -SnP was reduced gradually with repeated uses. The photocatalytic degradation reactions of 4-CP, AO7, and other organic substrates were studied systematically to show that the operating mechanisms are very different depending on the kind of substrates. The properties and activities of s -SnP and hetero -SnP as visible light photocatalysts were investigated in various ways and discussed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: