Why the study?
Does vectorcardiography correlate better than electrocardiography with coronary arteriography in detecting myocardial infarction in patients with suspected coronary heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Does vectorcardiography correlate better than electrocardiography with coronary arteriography in detecting myocardial infarction in patients with suspected coronary heart disease?
Vectorcardiography appears more sensitive than standard electrocardiography in detecting myocardial infarction, particularly posterior infarction, when correlated with coronary arteriography.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (1968) conducted a cross-sectional in suspected coronary heart disease (n=100). Vectorcardiography (VCG) and Electrocardiography (ECG) vs. Coronary arteriography was evaluated on Correlation of VCG and ECG evidence of infarction with coronary arteriography findings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: