This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Cellular analysis in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides important diagnostic information in many pathological settings. The aim of this two‐site study was to evaluate the Sysmex XN Body Fluid mode (XN‐BF) for cell analysis of CSF compared to light microscopy (LM). Methods Two hundred and seven consecutive CSF samples were analyzed in parallel with XN‐BF and LM. The study also included the estimation of the limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ), carry‐over and linearity of XN‐BF module. Results LoQ of white blood cells (WBC) was 3×106 cells/L; linearity was good and carry‐over negligible. XN‐BF parameters were compared to LM for the following cell classes: total cells, WBC, polymorphonuclear (PMN), and mononuclear (MN) cells. The bias ranged from 1.3 to 15.2×106 cells/L. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for WBC showed an area under the curve of 0.98, and the global diagnostic agreement was 95% at a cutoff of 5×106 cells/L. Conclusions XN‐BF provides rapid and accurate counts in clinically relevant ranges of CSF values, thus providing a valuable alternative to conventional LM analysis. However, microscopic review remains advisable in samples with abnormal cell counts or high fluorescent (HF‐BF) cell parameter exceeding 5×106 cells/L.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buoro et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: