Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan linked to ~31% lower risk of cognitive decline and dementia vs ACEI/ARBs in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Recent data refuted concerns about neurocognitive off-target effects of neprilysin inhibition, but the association of sacubitril/valsartan with cognitive outcomes in patients with HFrEF remained to be determined.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce the composite of cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease in adults with HFrEF compared to ACEI/ARB?
Cohort (n=22,626)
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce the composite of cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease in adults with HFrEF compared to ACEI/ARB?
Hazard Ratio: 0.69 (95% CI 0.63–0.75)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.7% vs 15%
p-value: p=< 0.001
In patients with HFrEF, sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a significantly lower 3-year risk of neurocognitive disorders and mortality compared to ACEI/ARBs.
Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower neurocognitive event rates in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Recent trial data refute concerns about neurocognitive off-target effects of neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril and suggest benefit in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction >40%. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan is associated with improved cognitive outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year cognitive outcomes in patients with HFrEF who receive sacubitril/valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Retrospective cohort study of: 1) 11,313 adults with HFrEF (International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] codes: I50.2 or I50.4) started on sacubitril/valsartan between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019; and 2) 11,313 propensity matched patients receiving ACEI/ARB during that time. Data were obtained from the TriNetX Research Network, encompassing 41 health care organizations in the United States. Primary endpoint was the composite of cognitive decline (ICD-10-CM: R41.8), dementia (ICD-10-CM: F01-F03), and Alzheimer’s disease (ICD-10-CM: G30). At 3 years, 858 patients on sacubitril/valsartan met the primary endpoint vs 1,209 on ACEI/ARB (3-year incidence: 10.7% vs 15.0%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75; P < 0.001), with consistently lower rates of cognitive decline (9.5% vs 13.3%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.76; P < 0.001), dementia (3.4% vs 5.0%; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.57-0.77; P < 0.001), and Alzheimer’s disease (0.6% vs 1.3%; HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35-0.66; P < 0.001) in the sacubitril/valsartan cohort. Results were consistent in matched sex and race subgroups. Three-year mortality was 22.0% on sacubitril/valsartan vs 24.6% on ACEI/ARB (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.94; P < 0.001). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower 3-year rates of neurocognitive disorders when compared to ACEI/ARBs in patients with HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grewal et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=22,626). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) was evaluated on Composite of cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.75, p=< 0.001). Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a lower 3-year incidence of cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer's disease compared to ACEI/ARBs in HFrEF (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.75; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: