Examines responses to the children’s book “William’s Doll” by two groups of fourth-grade students, one responding in 1975 and the other group responding in 1997. Finds that many responses to the idea of a boy wanting a doll for a toy still arose from heavily stereotyped attitudes toward gender. Notes implications for the classroom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greever et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: