Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Airborne carbonyls in large office buildings in the Midwestern United States have been studied both indoors and near the air-intakes environment using HPLC and GCMS methods. Air sampling for carbonyls was conducted using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine coated silica gel cartridges and stainless steel Tenax TA® tubes. 1,3-dinitrobenzene, 2,4-dinitrophenol and 2,4-dinitroaniline were tentatively identified as degradation products of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine by HPLC and GCMS analysis. Performance of the Tenax TA®-GCMS method under field sampling conditions was studied and Tenax TA® data was validated to estimate the lowest possible concentration of carbonyls in the environment, using a correction term derived from error propagation analysis. Analytical recovery, analytes' breakthrough percentage, and limitations of the DNPH-cartridge sampling are presented along with GCMS ion fragmentation data of the tentatively identified product(s). Carbonyls including formaldehyde (6.8 ± 8.8 ppbv),+ acetaldehyde (2.8 ± 3.2 ppbv), acetone (4.7 ± 8.9 ppbv), methyl ethyl ketone (0.4 ± 0.7 ppbv), 4-methyl-2-pentanone (0.5 ± 1.7 ppbv), n-hexanal (0.2 ± 0.6 ppbv) and n-heptanal (0.2 ± 1.8 ppbv) were present in indoor air. Outdoor concentrations were: formaldehyde, 2.1 ± 3.1 ppbv; acetaldehyde, 2.2 ± 2.4 ppbv; acetone, 1.4 ± 3.1 ppbv; methyl ethyl ketone, 0.6 ± 0.4 ppbv; 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 0.2 ± 0.1 ppbv; n-hexanal, 0.2 ± 0.5 ppbv; and n-heptanal (0.2 ± 0.4 ppbv). Total carbonyl concentrations (σco) were 15.6 ± 13.2 ppbv and 6.9 ± 5.1 ppbv in indoor and outdoor air respectively. Average formaldehyde levels (7ppbv) in non-complaint buildings were lower than the recommended concentration levels in indoors of residential environment (100 ppbv).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subramanian et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: