Key result
Smaller preoperative indexed LVESD predicts ~660% higher odds of early LVEF recovery after AVR.
Why the study?
Do preoperative indexed left ventricular dimensions predict early recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation?
Cohort (n=79)
No
Do preoperative indexed left ventricular dimensions predict early recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation?
Odds Ratio: 7.6
p-value: p=0.0095
Smaller preoperative indexed LV systolic and diastolic dimensions independently predict early restoration of LV systolic function after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation.
May aid preoperative risk stratification for LV recovery after AVR; leaves open prospective validation for timing decisions in chronic AR.
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). The objective of this study is to determine predictors for normalization of impaired LV systolic function after valve replacement for chronic AR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2007, 171 patients underwent AVR for severe chronic AR. Of these patients, 79 patients with LV systolic dysfunction or severe LV dilatation preoperatively, who were evaluated by echocardiography at predischarge and early follow up (mean, 6 months) were examined. The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 49%. The mean LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were 52.32 ± 8.35 mm and 69.59 ± 7.80 mm, respectively. In the early follow up, 62 of 79 patients exhibited restored normal LV function. LV end-systolic dimension and LV end-diastolic dimension were significantly decreased early after AVR (52.32 ± 8.35 mm vs 37.82 ± 6.88 mm, and 69.59 ± 7.80 mm vs 51.55 ± 6.40 mm, respectively). Operative mortality was 3.7%. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis revealed that preoperative indexed LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were independent predictors of restored LV systolic function. The sensitivity and specificity in predicting normalization of LV function were 88% and 92% for indexed LVESD <35.32 mm/m(2) and 71% and 86% for indexed LVEDD <44.42 mm/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received a valve replacement for chronic AR, smaller indexed LV systolic and diastolic dimensions were associated with early restoration of LV systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Severe chronic aortic regurgitation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or severe dilatation (n=79). Preoperative indexed left ventricular dimensions vs. Larger indexed left ventricular dimensions was evaluated on Early restoration of normal left ventricular systolic function (EF >50%) (OR 7.60, p=0.0095). Smaller preoperative indexed left ventricular end-systolic dimension (OR 7.60) and end-diastolic dimension (OR 0.383) independently predicted early restoration of left ventricular systolic function after aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: