Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 14, 2017Histopathology

Well‐differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (Pan NET s) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (Pan NEC s): concepts, issues and a practical diagnostic approach to high‐grade (G3) cases

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ASAatur D. SinghiDKDavid S. Klimstra

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Singhi et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa130f3dc6fbdec443d43e1https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13408
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1NANETS Treatment Guidelines2010 · 571 citations
  2. 2Pathology Reporting of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Application of the Delphic Consensus Process to the Development of a Minimum Pathology Data Set2010 · 355 citations
  3. 3The Neural Crest and the Origin of the Insulin-Producing and Other Gastrointestinal Hormone-Producing Cells1976 · 333 citations
  4. 4The Pathologic Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors2010 · 1,074 citations
  5. 5The Mitosis-Specific Antibody Anti-Phosphohistone-H3 (PHH3) Facilitates Rapid Reliable Grading of Meningiomas According to WHO 2000 Criteria2004 · 147 citations