This study reported Nepenthes rafflesiana pitcher (NP) and Nepenthes rafflesiana leaves (NL) as new adsorbents for methyl violet (MV) dye. The experiments were done using 2 h contact time and without any pH alteration (pH 4.4). The effects of pH and ionic strength revealed hydrophobic–hydrophobic interaction as the predominant force of dye interaction with the adsorbent. Both NP-MV and NL-MV followed pseudo-second-order model indicating the adsorption processes may be governed by chemical process. Weber–Morris intraparticle diffusion model verified that the rate-limiting step of both the NP-MV and NL-MV systems is not intraparticle diffusion. The Langmuir model best described the adsorption process with high maximum monolayer adsorption (q m) of 288.7 and 194.0 mg g−1 for NP-MV and NL-MV, respectively. Thermodynamics studies revealed both NP-MV and NL-MV systems are spontaneous and endothermic in nature. From the regeneration study, it was found that NP’s and NL’s adsorption capacities could be recovered using distilled water and base whereby distilled water was able to recover 78% (NP) and 71% (NL) while base was able to recover 82% for both samples after three regeneration cycles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kooh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: